|
Re: Serial Number chart [message #3434 is a reply to message #3432] |
Thu, 01 January 2004 20:18 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36e04/36e046684bfe921f8e0da60e8a91f7cc5b37aa86" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2be81/2be8193b12136f6b07068cb6fb68e958413dc5f0" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
|
I found an early K200 Frankenstein head and cab for sale with a penciled on model and serial no. Number 5376 so it would be a 1965 according to your chart. Do you know anything about penciled in numbers?
|
|
|
|
Re: Serial Number chart [message #3440 is a reply to message #3437] |
Fri, 02 January 2004 10:49 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36e04/36e046684bfe921f8e0da60e8a91f7cc5b37aa86" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2be81/2be8193b12136f6b07068cb6fb68e958413dc5f0" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
C4ster
Messages: 686 Registered: June 2001 Location: Mukwonago, WI (Milwaukee...
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I know that the pots will yield the date info of the pot, and an amp could not be a 65 if the pots were made in 67, but the opposite could be true. I FEEL the dating of an amp by the pots and speaker date codes would be iffy at best. Are ther any assurances that parts maunfactured were shipped and then used in the amps within a reasonable period of time to make dating reliable?? I am just curious and trying to stir up trouble.
Conrad
|
|
|
Re: Serial Number chart [message #3442 is a reply to message #3437] |
Fri, 02 January 2004 11:33 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36e04/36e046684bfe921f8e0da60e8a91f7cc5b37aa86" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2be81/2be8193b12136f6b07068cb6fb68e958413dc5f0" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
|
Les, I agree that pot codes are more accurate for now than serial numbers. As I recall though, pot codes were 6 digits (3 digit manufacturer ID and 3 digit date code)in the 40's and 50's, and 7 digits in the 60' and subsuquent. That would make the 38th week of 1967 as 6738. Do you concur?
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Serial Number chart [message #3455 is a reply to message #3453] |
Sat, 03 January 2004 15:28 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36e04/36e046684bfe921f8e0da60e8a91f7cc5b37aa86" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
BC
Messages: 583 Registered: March 2000 Location: Kentucky
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Bud told us a very interesting story about the penciled S/N. As I recall in the early days he would sometimes have orders for amps and no funds for materials to build them. He would go around and pick up amps that had been returned to the stores for repair under the "lifetime guarantee" These amps would be repaired...updated ...and sold with new numbers. The money generated by these sales bought new material to build amps to replace the ones that needed repair! I guy has to do what a guy has to do!
Les I have found that the "A" series 200 amp ends somewhere around the 27XXX numbers and the "B" series 200s begin.
I think pots and speaker dates are a good guide to dating the amps....but you have to watch for replacements on amps as old as these and they will usually get you within a few months. Since no records from Kustom have been found this may be the best we will ever have.BC
|
|
|