Differences in 200 heads [message #7346] |
Thu, 17 August 2006 12:44 |
ZiggyDude
Messages: 24 Registered: May 2006 Location: Harrisburg PA
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Greetings
I saw a silver 200 head - the 4 channel PA version - the other day for sale. It had only small issues like two dials were missing the silver inserts and the blue/purple light cover was replaced with a red piece. Really was bummed on that last one - need fix that if I get it.
Anyway - I am a bass player and don't really need a PA head - unless it works as well for bass. I suppose the back end power supply is about the same as the bass heaad version?
I guess the basic quesion - other than the bright channel - what would be the difference in tone or performance if I plugged a bass into a PA head and used it to power a bass cabinet versus using a bass head? Assuming they are both Kusstom 200s?
Thanx,
- Ziggy -
|
|
|
Re: Differences in 200 heads [message #7349 is a reply to message #7346] |
Thu, 17 August 2006 23:11 |
rodak
Messages: 516 Registered: October 2001 Location: Georgia
|
Senior Member |
|
|
I don't think there's any difference at all. Should sound great, go for it! Make sure to load it with 4ohms, for maximum volume.
www.combo-organ.com
|
|
|
|
Re: Differences in 200 heads [message #7356 is a reply to message #7353] |
Fri, 18 August 2006 12:21 |
chicagobill
Messages: 2006 Registered: April 2003
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ziggy:
I had to look this up on the schematic, but the 200B PA's use the same board and same eq values as the "Normal" channel on the 200B-1 Bass heads. The bright switch is hard wired "on" with a jumper, and the reverb pot is installed in its place. So, with the exception of the reverb, it's pretty much the same amp.
So I agree with Rodak, and think you should "Go For It!"
Bill
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Differences in 200 heads [message #7376 is a reply to message #7346] |
Wed, 23 August 2006 07:31 |
stevem
Messages: 4775 Registered: June 2004 Location: NY
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Well you can call the k200b-1 a bass head if you want but I would vote for calling it a all instrument head, heres why. 3 years ago a tech friend who unfortunatly has moved away let me do a frequency spectrum sweep on both channels of a k200B with no effects, and he provided the sweeps of many fender amps. The brite channel sweep looked real close to a Fender blackface twin vibrato channel with the mid control set to just less than half. The dark channel as Kustom calls it looks like a Fender 1959 bassman EQ almost with its stronger bass output below 120 cycles and less highs above 3000 cycles, much like a gibson on the humbucking neck pickup would look, or sound I should say.I`am not saying Kustom went for copying the general fender sound, Think they wanted a EQ to work will all pickups well, be they single coil or humbucker. Its interesting that the early adds that Kustom had for the k100 amps use the MELLOW SOUND term in the sound discription of that serise of amps, yet the k200s have the same value tone circuit componets.I wonder if that mellow sound add worked out as well as Kustom hoped, as during that same time just about the beatles where tring to get the most treble tone they could out into their recordings. Not that I am a fan of that britley sound, its just interesting.I will try to find these sweep copys and post them. I got alot of flopy disc to look thru so dont hold your breath!
|
|
|