VintageKustom.com
VintageKustom.com is your source for literature and information on the tuck-and-roll vintage Kustom amps from the 60's and 70's, as well as their related products such as guitars and organs . We provide a webboard for help with kustom gear history, technical information and repairs as well as discussions with other collectors.

Home » VintageKustom.com » Repairing Kustom Amps » Burnt PC900 (need parts ID'd)
Show: Today's Messages :: Polls :: Message Navigator
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Burnt PC900 [message #23270] Sun, 05 July 2015 19:56 Go to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

i am working on a K100-5 Pa AMP
the PC900 board has burnt resistors and i am unable to ID them and the PC900 schematic i have does not seem to match up with the board i am using. can anyone give me any help?
i do have a lot of electronics experience. so far i have found that someone has worked on this before and they did horrible work on it.
the output transistors are shorted, and a few other parts are also blown.
i do not see how to post any fotos here.
thanks for anyone that can help...
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23271 is a reply to message #23270] Sun, 05 July 2015 23:05 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chicagobill
Messages: 2006
Registered: April 2003
Senior Member
Welcome to the place.

I'm not sure about the photo question, but I will try and help you with the resistor questions. The PC900 board contains the main power amp circuit and the low voltage regulator circuits for the preamp circuits.

Often when the output transistors short, they will take out the driver transistors and a few others as well. The basic circuit is the same for a lot of the amps, so you should be able figure out the values that you need. Try and figure out what the burned resistors connect to and that will help to figure out the values.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23276 is a reply to message #23270] Mon, 06 July 2015 18:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

if someone had a close up foto of the board that would help me a lot..
on my board Q903 has a glass diode connected directly to one leg then it goes over to the diode string (900,901?)
i was going to try to add in a link,.but the forum here says i cannot add links til i have posted 10x ( sigh )
so i'll ty to describe things.. or if you want to do email. i can send fotos thru there.

on the board Q903 goes to the glass diode.then it goes over to the 2 metal diodes on the board and then to the bottom of the 3900 ohm resistor. the glass diode is shorted, and i am unable to read anything off of it.. but on the schematic there is no diodes that come off any leg of the Q903..
also noted on the board this glass diode, there is a jumper wire next to it..and it is located next to Q904.

Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23279 is a reply to message #23276] Mon, 06 July 2015 20:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chicagobill
Messages: 2006
Registered: April 2003
Senior Member
I think that you are describing Q906, one of the limiter transistors. Q903 is the voltage amp and is normally a metal cased TO-39 transistor. Is there a 95 ohm and a 510 ohm resistor connected to this transistor?
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23302 is a reply to message #23279] Tue, 07 July 2015 19:13 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

well i just wasted 40 min typing out a reply..then hit submit reply..it took me right away to log in AGAIN..and all that i typed was lost. i am sooo pissed right now...let me see if i can remember all that i wanted to say.. hopefully i am not kicked out again, will try to condense it this time for my sake.

1st of all to let you know, i down loaded the PC900 schematic & transistor diagram. i start to think that the transistor diagram may have errors, for 1 Q906 is not listed. Q907 has the glass diode and i see the 510 Ohm resistor, but i do not see a 95 Ohm resistor anywhere on the board unless it is burned up , but the burnt resistors are located between the heat sinks (listed as Q904 & Q905)
and the transistor located between the heat sinks is listed as a Q903.

so either the "transistor diagram" or the schematic is not correct. in my logic i'd think that the drivers are the ones with heat sinks
( on schematic Q906-Q907 ) but on the transistor diagram they are listed as Q904 & Q905
am i missing something here or did i find a error ?
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23304 is a reply to message #23270] Tue, 07 July 2015 19:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stevem is currently offline  stevem
Messages: 4774
Registered: June 2004
Location: NY
Senior Member
If you have a Q907 then you have a Q906.
The fd111 crystal diode is off of 906 collector .
The 510 ohm is off its base lead , and that 95.3 ohm resistor is off its emitter and is joined at its end by the other 95.3 ohm on the other protection resistor.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23317 is a reply to message #23270] Wed, 08 July 2015 15:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chicagobill
Messages: 2006
Registered: April 2003
Senior Member
The driver transistors are the ones with the heat sinks, Q904 and Q905. They are often short when the outputs go bad, so they should also be tested.

Q906 and Q907 are the limiter transistors. They are there to reduce the drive if the outputs are driven too hard. And you are right Q906 is not shown on the layout diagram.

The 510 and 95 ohm resistors set the point at which the limiting action takes place. That is part of the reason that they are specified as precision metal film resistors.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23322 is a reply to message #23317] Wed, 08 July 2015 16:27 Go to previous messageGo to next message
pleat is currently offline  pleat
Messages: 1454
Registered: June 2004
Location: Belding, Mi
Senior Member
The PC900 schematic on this site shows the Q906 and Q907
pleat
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23326 is a reply to message #23270] Wed, 08 July 2015 19:22 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stevem is currently offline  stevem
Messages: 4774
Registered: June 2004
Location: NY
Senior Member
It's interesting, in the combo amps that 95.3 ohm resistor is a 100 ohm.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23412 is a reply to message #23270] Mon, 13 July 2015 07:45 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

bump....
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23414 is a reply to message #23270] Mon, 13 July 2015 10:11 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stevem is currently offline  stevem
Messages: 4774
Registered: June 2004
Location: NY
Senior Member
I do not know what you are looking at, but in regards to this sites tech section I found Q906 on the k100-8 listing for PC900, and I found Q906 on the straight up PC900 schematic on this site along with the 95 ohm resistor on both schematics!
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23513 is a reply to message #23270] Tue, 28 July 2015 21:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

ok,, i think i have 1 big step in being on my way to repairing the board..
1st of all the downloadable schematic and the transistor page are for the K100-5 and the PC900
but the page for the transistor diagram is NOT correct.
The transistor between Q902 and Q907 is not listed, it is actually Q903
and on the diagram Q903 is actually Q906
i was wracking my brain trying to compare the transistor diagram to the schematic.
so now it to make sense to me now.

now i just wish there was a component diagram,, does anyone know what the 2 horizontal resistors are that are next to the Q906 transistor ? 2 of them are burned to ashes. i believe one is a 95.3 ohm @ 1% and the other is 510ohm @5%
but i do not know which one is which..they are parallel to each other in a horizontal position
i think that the 510 ohm 5% is the lower one and the 95.3 1% is on the upper ?
can anyone can confirm this ?
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23519 is a reply to message #23270] Wed, 29 July 2015 06:38 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stevem is currently offline  stevem
Messages: 4774
Registered: June 2004
Location: NY
Senior Member
I can check latter for you if Bill does not come to your rescue .
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23523 is a reply to message #23270] Wed, 29 July 2015 12:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chicagobill
Messages: 2006
Registered: April 2003
Senior Member
Sorry, I can't help other than to tell you to look at the pc traces where the two resistors are mounted. What do they connect to?

Once you know what they are connected to, you can figure out where they are on the schematic, which will tell you what the values are.

If I had a PC900, I'd tell you what it has, but I don't own one. Sorry.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23526 is a reply to message #23523] Wed, 29 July 2015 19:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

looking in the schematic..i can't quite tell
is the 1% resistor is a 95.3 ohm or a 96.3 ohm
can someone advise..
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23528 is a reply to message #23270] Wed, 29 July 2015 19:57 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stevem is currently offline  stevem
Messages: 4774
Registered: June 2004
Location: NY
Senior Member
95.3, but in latter amps they rounded these off to 100 ohm.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23529 is a reply to message #23270] Thu, 30 July 2015 10:51 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chicagobill
Messages: 2006
Registered: April 2003
Senior Member
I haven't seen the 100 ohm value anywhere.

The 95.3 ohm resistor sets the turn on point for the limiter. The two halves should at least be the same value.

Do you have a variac or limiter available to you? You will probably want to power up with some sort of protection device when you first power on the amp with the new parts.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23536 is a reply to message #23529] Thu, 30 July 2015 14:48 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

i do have a variac and various limiter lamps.
so that is not a problem,

so should i stick with the 1% resistor or update it to the 100 ohm,, and should they be of 1% also ?

i have found the diode i need that clips onto the heat sink, i bought a pair of them off of ebay. when i got the amp it had a glass diode floating in the air. and later discovered that the diode was loose, and i believe that is what caused it to go up in flames.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23541 is a reply to message #23270] Fri, 31 July 2015 06:33 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stevem is currently offline  stevem
Messages: 4774
Registered: June 2004
Location: NY
Senior Member
My revision 4 , PC 900 schematic dated 1970 shows a value of 95.3, the K100 piggie back amps show a 100 ohm value, and the metal face K150 heads list a 150 ohm value for those resistors and all of these amps where made to drive a 8 ohm load.
I would conclude that the matching of them is more important than the value, but I am no circuit designer!

I found my Kustom layout and as always they only show the transistor location on the board that's it for components.

The leads of that glass diode if not insulate shorting out on its clip is what likely made things ugly !

On a side note, I played in a show band in Fayettville for two weeks back in 80 or 81 at what seemed like the only hotel in town back then, and yes using a K250 head, lol!

[Updated on: Fri, 31 July 2015 06:38]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23547 is a reply to message #23270] Fri, 31 July 2015 14:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

the glass diode was never attached to the heat sink...
i have some parts on order.. will order the rest this weekend.
who ever worked on it before did not go back with proper parts.



let me guess,,, in Fayetteville, down town...only hotel.. would it have been the
Price Charles's Hotel or the Quality Inn or maybe the St. James Inn ?
those are about the only 3 that i can think of for back in the 80's
where did you play ? "Rick's Lounge"? very popular back then..
there was also the "Cellar". hope one of them rings a bell Smile
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23548 is a reply to message #23270] Fri, 31 July 2015 15:19 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chicagobill
Messages: 2006
Registered: April 2003
Senior Member
Steve M-I haven't looked up any of those other schematics, but remember that these read the voltage being dropped across the emitter resistor which is different on different amps, like the metalfront uses 0.51 ohm resistors instead of the 1 ohm resistors of the earlier models.

dacflyer-There are a lot of these amps that have been "fixed" by folks that take the approach of just make it work. No real thought of doing it right. When I see an amp that has signs of this type of work, I go over the entire amp to see exactly what was done to it and what needs to be redone to make it correct. Sounds like you need to do the same thing.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23551 is a reply to message #23270] Sat, 01 August 2015 05:58 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stevem is currently offline  stevem
Messages: 4774
Registered: June 2004
Location: NY
Senior Member
That glass diodes insulative properties even if clipped in would have been likely to not track right, or too slow.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #23555 is a reply to message #23548] Sat, 01 August 2015 16:29 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

this is exactly what i am trying to do.. that's why i am making sure i can read the numbers etc. on the schematic correctly.
some of the print is blurred and hard to read..
and so far ( slowly ) i am finding the correct parts i need.
i'll keep you all posted on my progress.
thanks.
Re: Burnt PC900 ( UPDATE ) Success it is working again. [message #24264 is a reply to message #23270] Mon, 28 December 2015 15:07 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

hey all,, just wanted to post that i finally got the Amp working again. will post pix later on.
took a while to get all the board parts, and i had a minor issue.
( installed wrong transistor, should have been a PNP not a NPN. ) schematic issues..lol
anyway it is working like a champ now. only concern i have is about the pilot lamp.
there is a resistor in series with the lamp. the lamp works fine but the resistor gets quite hot. is this normal for the pilot lamp ? right now it has what appears to be a 12v lamp.
can anyone advise on this ?
thanks..
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #24266 is a reply to message #23270] Tue, 29 December 2015 00:16 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chicagobill
Messages: 2006
Registered: April 2003
Senior Member
Glad to hear that you got it working.

The pilot lamp should be a 28 volt bulb, I think a #1829. If the bulb is a 12 or 6 volt one the 200 ohm resistor will get very hot and the bulb will burn out faster than normal.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #24268 is a reply to message #23270] Tue, 29 December 2015 09:55 Go to previous messageGo to next message
dacflyer is currently offline  dacflyer
Messages: 17
Registered: July 2015
Location: Fayetteville NC
Junior Member

well the bulb that is in it right now is not bright, and it is a 12v bulb, but the resistor, i do know it is a 5 watt resistor. you would think that the lamp would run off of the mains power, rather than the secondary.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #24269 is a reply to message #23270] Tue, 29 December 2015 11:20 Go to previous messageGo to next message
stevem is currently offline  stevem
Messages: 4774
Registered: June 2004
Location: NY
Senior Member
I know, I guess that for some reason Kustom / Bud Ross thought it cool to have lamp dim with the current draw of the amp, I don't know?
I guess one reason would be to keep hum inducing ac voltage of any level away from the front center of the amp and making for hum pick up in the preamp section!
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #24270 is a reply to message #23270] Tue, 29 December 2015 11:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
chicagobill
Messages: 2006
Registered: April 2003
Senior Member
I looked up the lamp number and it is a #1828.
Re: Burnt PC900 [message #24271 is a reply to message #24270] Tue, 29 December 2015 12:55 Go to previous message
C4ster
Messages: 686
Registered: June 2001
Location: Mukwonago, WI (Milwaukee...
Senior Member
I am sure it's an 1829. 28V, 70mA My schematics say so!
Conrad
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Kustom V Lead
Next Topic: K200A Head Cabinet Questions
Goto Forum:
  

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ]

Current Time: Wed Nov 06 11:42:33 EST 2024